On 28 Jan 2014, at 23:34, Norbert Hartl <
norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
Am 28.01.2014 um 22:50 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:
they do not appear because they shouldn�t :)
MCPackage = RPackage in 3.0
Ah, very good. I see this of course shortly after I applied ones again stupid package names to be able to separate tests.
that means that you need 3 mc packages� or 1 r packages + 2 tags
tags? What year is it? At the moment I�m feeling as I had been off the list for quite a while! Ok, I�ll try to find these myself.
Btw. 30 minutes ago I found metacello stuff (create baseline, create development version) in the menu of the monticello packages. Great stuff! Are you sure there isn�t a lot of good stuff sneaking in without anyone noticing?
btw� there are still some glitches with that that need to be fixed. Please report if/when you find them :)
Oh my, I hate it because that is the one thing I�m good at�.finding bugs.
cool� we need more like you (and so far Stef has the podium) :)
Is there anything to take care in a mixed environment. I have 2.0/3.0 mixed setting here. From now on I like to develop in 3.0 even if the code is loaded into a 2.0 image. Can I expect trouble when loading the finer grained packages produced via 3.0 in a 2.0 image?
it should work without problem� but of course if you attempt to save in 2.0 package A will include A-B and A-C :)
Yep, and I will have dirty packages in my image. Thanks for the hint but I can live with that. The next time I think I could do a dirty hotfix on the server and save it I will be in trouble :)