Split into subissues; 2 of them are ready, another 2 need discussion
On 02.11.2015 18:30, Peter Uhn��k [via Smalltalk] wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]
> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4858985&i=0>> wrote:
>
> �� �� Benjamin forced us to react and the Inria lawyers did their job.
> �� �� Then he wrote this funny sentence.
> �� �� I asked the inria laywers to stay calm when they saw this sentence.
> �� �� You know they laugh one minute
> �� �� and after they want to attack. So I would ignore anything related to
> �� �� Benjamin because the spirit is not
> �� �� positive.
>
> �� �� I would focus on the current spec issues in Pharo and see step by
> �� �� step how we can address them.
> �� �� If we propose the same solution that in the Spec git repo then it
> �� �� will be a coincidence.
>
>
> So ideally we should open separate issue for each of the things you want
> to integrate and resolve them one at a time.
> Several smaller issues are more manageable than one big "integrate X
> things" issue.
> And close the original one, or add the new ones as subissues.
>
> Peter
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://forum.world.st/Case-16725-why-no-reaction-tp4858968p4858985.html
> To unsubscribe from Case 16725: why no reaction?, click here
> <
> NAML
> <http://forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
View this message in context: Re: Case 16725: why no reaction?
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.