>Just imagine things like that...
> But the problem is that the *semantics* are still that of Smalltalk, and it�s completely not clear for the programmer where the similarity ends.
>
> If you want to have �I can type in examples from my ruby book� compatibility, you need to implement the real semantics, which in many cases
> means to re-implement the VM of that other language (in a very slow version) on top of your VM which does not really have the properties to
> support those semantics.
>
https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
:-)
� � � � Marcus