They already are integrated! it's a matter of rewrite all usages of MultiByteScaryStream and friends...

El jue., 30 de abr. de 2015 a la(s) 4:06 p. m., stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> escribi��:

> I am biased, but the Zn converters are better. Why ? Because they work between String <-> Bytes as a text encoder/decoder should. They also have a number of extra features (counting the number of encoded bytes, being able to move backwards on input, being able to be very strict), are faster and have a clearer implementation. Furthermore, they are more correct and implement more encodings.
>
> There is also good documentation http://stfx.eu/EnterprisePharo/Zinc-Encoding-Meta/
>
> ZnCharacter[Read|Write]Stream are also very instructive, compare them to MultiByteStream.
>
> Should we throw the other one out ? Probably. But it is the same problems as with Xtreams: the API is different and adding a compatibility layer would defeat the purpose. So I don't know.
>
> Sven

I would integrate the good ones and deprecate the old ones!

Stef