On 16 March 2011 17:07, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
>>as i said.. it is too clever :)
>
> Yes and as I already noted on issue #3595 relative paths are now
> supported but relative means currently "relative to the image location"
> since "FileDirectory default" is used.
> I think there is not yet a primitive to tell you where the VM is located
> and that was the reason to implement it like this.
>
> But in a typical scripting language paths are relative to
> the executable (the VM in this case).
>
> �diamond.exe ../foo.dia

mm. no. Typically a relative paths are relative to the directory where
you issued the command line,
not relative to the directory where command located.

>
> So if I build a new scripting language (with a custom diamond.exe VM)
> based on Pharo the VM location is required - the image itself could
> life elsewhere on the hard disk (given in the ini file for
> instance).
>
> Bye
> T.
>
>
>
> --
> GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit
> gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
>
>

--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.