I see that the installScript uses ConfigurationOfMetacello from
gemsource metacello repository instead of Metacello repository. Given
that this will be the final release of 1.0, shouldn't we copy
ConfigurationOfMetacello to squeaksource/MetacelloRepository so that the
package registered in monticello is this instead of the gemstone one.
This repo for ConfigurationOfMetacello overrides the one of PharoCore
that points to squeaksource.

Dale, can you put this version in squeaksource. The release is very
close and anyway it will be shipped in Pharo dev 1.0, so will reach a
lot of people, even if not on squeaksource

Yes. This is because I added the ImageForDevelopers in the group. With that, when running headless I have the problem with the progress Bar.
Then, i needed to use the silntly method, which is in Metacello beta.25 which is not released yet. That's why I have to put the other one.

Don't worry that beta.25 will be then correctly uploaded and released. After that, the installScript will be even simpler as I won't need to install Metacello manually, but with the ensureMetacello ;)

Cheers

Mariano

�

Cheers
>
> Mariano
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-users mailing list
> Pharo-users@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users

--
Miguel Cob�
http://miguel.leugim.com.mx