The thing is you use to have one instance of the same MCRepository per package.

By example, the Pharo repository was in fact #{packageNumber} instances.

So the change you make on one (by example, string your password) was not reflected to the others.

And it seems that during the fix of this, this issue was introduced.

(I think the easy solution taken was to have the same repositories for everything).

It�s indeed kind of a paint o deal with, but a smaller one that it use to be :)

Definitely it�s a bug, not a feature :)

We should wait tip Guillermo�s answer since he was the one fixing this painful behaviour (2 sprints ago)

Ben

On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:44, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

I do not understand what the password has to do with showing only the relevant repositories for a selected package. Could you explain?

Doru


On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo@gmail.com> wrote:

The idea was that repositories were shared among packages.

Otherwise, you have to type your password a billion times

Ben

On 03 Nov 2013, at 21:49, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

Indeed, I wanted to raise this issue as well. The Monticello browser is a rather terrible interface, but at least the scoping of repositories was useful. Is the change intentional, or is it a bug?

Doru


On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
Hi!

Before, when one selects a package (left list), then only the set of relevant repositories are displayed (right list). This is now not the case anymore. I think I have seen somewhere a MC package is not associated to a repository anymore. What is the idea behind this? I find this rather convenient...

Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.







--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"