Hi,

2015-03-24 15:27 GMT+01:00 Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com>:
Hi,

I think I do not understand this point. Why do you say that the future solution will be less than Morphic?


Because we're driving it with uses which are less than Morphic requirements were.

Because you don't need Morphic power to do GT tools; it justs gets in the way: slow, over-engineered for that use case. As a consequence, you end up with Rubricks: dedicated, ad-hoc solution which is a far better match for its use case. That Rubricks proudly present its Z layering where Morphic was / is probably the easiest toolkit ever to do layering of arbitrary widgets on top of another? (*)

Thierry

(*) Even if we're not doing it(**).

(**) Well, I did. Nobody's interested, so what ?




Doru

Thierry



--

"Every thing has its own flow"