Le 26/07/2014 10:04, Marcus Denker a ��crit :We could have one. It would allow people to write Pharo code with emacs, have a pharo emacs-el mode, and try a different way to use git :)
On 26 Jul 2014, at 10:02, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
Thierry we asked Mark Rizun to look into get a full "compilation unit" as an AST:Only the name AST is wrong: the S stand for Syntax. There is no syntax for Classes, nor
�� �� - AST for packages
�� �� - AST for class definition.
He should look at what gisela proposed and any feedback is interesting.
packages.
This would be cool. I have the nodes and the visitors for all the way from packages to method, but it stops at the method / class description level (and switches to the RB ast then).
What we want is models for everything with *the same API* as the nodes of the AST.
(and visitors that can visit the whole structure)
Thierry