Not with the tons of configs I load and the fact that Roassal2 has been moving under my feet.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:

> On 30 Jul 2015, at 10:27, phil@highoctane.be wrote:
>
> Most of the feedback is "won't fix" or "done in 4.x or 5.x"
> All nice but hard to look at as day to day work is in 3.0

You have to move, you are missing out on all the nice stuff !

Seriously, I understand that you stay at what you know because things are probably already complex enough, but really upgrading is often easier than you think.

> This effect will only get worse over time I guess.
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have 622 open issues. There are *a lot* of old issues that nobody will ever look at.
> Please check those that *you* submitted to see what the status is!
>
> If it is just ���would be nice���, but not even on a level that you yourself are willing to even
> send a mail to the mailing list to get people interested in helping you to push the case
> forward, maybe you could think about closing the issue?
>
> Maybe someone asked a question? If you submit an issue and there is a question not answered
> for a month, we should close it: How important can it be? Why should *I* spend the time to fix
> this issue if *you* are not even willing to answer a question in a minute?
>
> It makes no sense to have lots and lots of issues that are not important even for the submitter.
>
> Another thing is that issues get fixed, subsystems replaced, code removed��� and the amazing thing
> is that *never* the submitter of the original report closes it, even in these obvious cases.
>
> The issue tracker is not a one way street!
>
>         Marcus
>
>
>