well... I use it a lot... yes, mainly for "FillInTheBlank". 
In fact, I usually add it to my programs... 
however, I'm not sure if we have to deprecate it (and replace for a larger code), or adopt it :)

cheers,
Esteban

El 19/07/2011, a las 7:14a.m., Nicolas Cellier escribi�:

I don't like isEmptyOrNil.
It has been introduced mainly because we can now distinguish these two operations in a "FillInTheBlank"
- cancel returns nil
- accept returns a String eventually empty
The original implementation did always return an empty String even if cancel was pressed.

But no application is really prepared to deal with nil, and most did interpret an empty String as a cancel.
So we replaced the isEmpty checks by isEmptyOrNil...

I would have done it differently:
1) let the default return an empty String even if cancelled
2) provide a ifCancelled: addtional key for the rare apps which really need to distinguish.

UIManager default request: 'OK ?' initialAnswer: '' ifCancelled: [^nil].

Default behaviour would be equivalent to
UIManager default request: 'OK ?' initialAnswer: '' ifCancelled: [''].

So my take would be to deprecate it.

Nicolas

2011/7/19 St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>
Hi guys

I'm puzzled and probably need food. but why  isEmptyOrNil is not defined in Object?
because right now if a variable is '' or nil or something else I cannot use it.

Stef