Anyone can help here?

On Sep 20, 2013, at 5:32 PM, roberto.minelli@usi.ch wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It's me again..
>
> I managed to have something *almost* working, but the behavior of the ROTreeMapLayout is not clear to me.
>
> Using the ROMondrianViewBuilder I can specify the size of the Tree map, but then I am not able to dynamically add nodes. Well, at least I did not manage to do that. So I moved to pure Roassal, as suggested by Alejandro.
>
> Here's how my actual code looks like: http://ws.stfx.eu/CFM522Z9X3ES
>
> I am a beginner with Roassal, so I spend some time to figure out how to draw the tree map in this way. I did not really quite understand why I have to add the ROBox new size: 200 to the ROElement, but I'll figure it out.
>
> The thing is when I try to add the new node. Following, again, Alejandro's advice I am writing something like:
>
> "I add a new node, re-layout the view, and signalUpdate"
> rawView add: ((ROElement on: 10) + (ROBox new size: 200)).
> (ROTreeMapLayout withWeightBlock: [ :e | e model ]) applyOn: rawView elements.
> rawView signalUpdate .
>
> The result is quite strange, the view is indeed updated but I cannot understand why all sizes are messed up.
>
> My questions, in short are: How can I fix the overall size of the tree map? Am I doing everything correct till now?
>
> Thanks again for your help,
> Roby
>
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 11:24 AM, roberto.minelli@usi.ch wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was playing around with Roassal (in particular, a tree map) and I have a question: Is there a way to dynamically adding nodes? I mean, once the view is generated to update the #nodes by adding a new node (and associations as well, i.e., edges) and have the visualization re-
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Roby
>
>