I agree with you now it can make the name long. But we could have SpecWindowModel.

To me it would help.��

At least with Spec all the models should terminate with model.��

On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Peter Uhnak <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:

I suppose this applies to other tools/frameworks as well, but is it beneficial to have non-prefixed classes in the system?

e.g. in Spec we have WindowModel, AbstractAdapter, TreeModel, ...

I am not asking because I want these generic terms free, but rather to be more explicit about the classes being from Spec.

Is there any "official" view or preferred view on this?

Thanks,
Peter