If we understand nil as the empty set (like some other languages do), then Set with: nil is not any different than Set with: Set new.

2011/5/20 Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com>
On 20 May 2011 04:13, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since a year ago, we have this issue:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1907
>
> There were 2 solutions proposed, and the 2 were developed by different
> people.�� But for some reason it was not integrated and continuously
> postponed.
>
> So, my question is: Do we want Sets accepting nil?�� If we don't, the issue
> is invalid.�� If we do, can someone review the code proposed?
>

Its not invalid. Stef reminds me about it from time to time.
And actually we wanted to sit and review and integrate it but it
always something else needs our attention.

> Thanks!
> Guille
>



--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.