Max,

Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC so). I'm no expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base implementation". Someone with more knowledge can probably tell ;)

Sven,

The bare minimum to load it is:

Gofer it
�� smalltalkhubUser: 'JanVanDeSandt' project: 'Cloudfork';
�� package: 'Cloudfork-Common';
�� package: 'Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform';
�� load.

The implementation is in Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:

I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look...

On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, Fran��ois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of view to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 class) in the System-Hashing package (in ��where there's already SHA1 and MD5) ?
>
> Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256 base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case I probably wouldn��t add it. In the latter case it��s open for discussion. Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not into System-Hashing.
>
> Cheers,
> Max