On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Janko Miv�ek
<janko.mivsek@eranova.si> wrote:
Michael Rueger pravi:
> Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>> But they are not the same. Universe, monticello and SM are different
>> things.
> I agree, and we will definitely have Universes.
>
> Me, personally, don't use SqueakMap at all anymore, but if people would
> like to keep it in Pharo I'm fine with it.
But it is important that Universes UI is then "uplifted" to be as usable
as SqueakMap is. This tool is namely aimed for end users, not developers
and specially newbies need to have as simple as possible way to load
software.
SM is close to that, Universes not. Universes has the �biggest advantage
to load all prerequisite packages, but lacks other things like easy
search for packages, etc.
Totally agree. I would love having search option in universe or dependencies management in SM haha.
�
Best regards
Janko
--
Janko Miv�ek
AIDA/Web
Smalltalk Web Application Server
http://www.aidaweb.si