> On 8 Jul 2017, at 09:29, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter - I just hit this yesterday with your kind help deciphering SmalltalkCI, and I have to confess that "src" was my inclination over repository for the reason you mention in that it is a repository already.
>
> I noticed other STCi projects have used "packages" .
>
> I would vote for "src" so other newcomers more easily understand what it is compared to where they came from.

yes, I agree��� even if at first is me the one who used mc, I think ���src���is better convention, now (that���s why pharo is using it :P)

Esteban

>
> I also think it would be helpful for iceberg to default to using that so we get some consistency?
>
> Tim
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 7 Jul 2017, at 17:03, Peter Uhnak <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 04:53:20PM +0200, Denis Kudriashov wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I though it was already done :)
>>> One notice. Should we all follow standard convention on repo structure?
>>> Because source directory in beacon is called "repository" instead "src"
>>> like in other repos.
>>
>> There is no standard convention for Pharo repos on github.
>>
>> In pharo-project I see
>>
>> * repository 3x
>> * mc 3x
>> * src 1x (not smalltalk code)
>>
>> And the rest of the github uses a variety of options
>>
>> * nothing
>>�� ��- imho disorganized and very messy if you have several packages
>> * repository
>>�� ��- I've been using it and recommending it for ~2 years; also used by filetree and metacello repos ;)
>>�� ��- Argument could be made that git is already a repository so it could be confusing
>> * mc
>>�� ��- because MontiCello/MetaCello I guess? I don't know how much this makes sense in the light of Iceberg
>> * src
>>�� ��- quite common in other programming languages
>> * packages
>>�� ��- well, the folder does contain just packages
>>
>> Someone could mine github to find precise numbers... but current usage shouldn't be a deciding factor.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>>
>>> 2017-07-07 16:45 GMT+02:00 Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name>:
>>>
>>>> I used the git migration tool of Peter Uhnak to migrate Beacon from
>>>> smalltalkhub to github. It is available now here
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-beacon
>>>>
>>>> I just need to know how I can switch a smalltalkhub project to read-only.
>>>>
>>>> FYI,
>>>>
>>>> Norbert
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>