Hi Steph,

�� �my approach to this is to define ClassReference that sits alongside MethodReference and so allows the list browser tools (list browser, change list, etc) to compare class definitions. �If you think this makes sense let me know and I'll extract the code (I no longer have a change set; this code is now integrated into our images).

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:11 AM, St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Yep!
I will do that
Stef
On Jan 11, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Gary Chambers wrote:

> Saw that too.
> One or the other! Defniniton perhaps (also on PackageInfo would do the lot).
>
> Regards, Gary
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "St�phane Ducasse" <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>
> To: <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:57 PM
> Subject: [Pharo-project] definition or getSource for Class and
> CompiledMethod
>
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I was looking at the video of laurent and what stroke me is that
>> getting the source of class or a compiled method is not polymorphic.
>> It would be good to support that.
>> aClass getSource?
>> aCompiledMethod definition?
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project