On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2016-03-23 12:38 GMT+01:00 Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com>:
>>
>> Maybe...
>>�� [ mock someMessage. mock2 somMessage2 ] shouldve beenSent
>>
>> but maybe you don't want different #shouldXXX messages.
>
>
> Thank you too, Ben. And yes it will not follow other should expressions. But
> it would not be bad to use completely different word instead of #should

Okay, then perhaps...

[mock someMessage. mock2 someMessage2] were sent
[mock someMessage. mock2 someMessage2] were sentInOrder

[mock someMessage. mock2 someMessage2] were done
[mock someMessage. mock2 someMessage2] were doneInOrder

but then do you also need singular #was for single items?

IMO use "was done/was doneInOrder".�� It is correct English to say "a compound action was performed".�� In any case it is the block that is evaluated, and that's a singular item.

[mock someMessage. mock2 someMessage2] expect done
[mock someMessage. mock2 someMessage2] expect doneInOrder

Expect squeezes in usage in both future and past tense...
"I expect he'll arrive soon"
"I expect he went home"

cheers -ben

_,,,^..^,,,_

best,��Eliot