> On 1 Dec 2016, at 08:06, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
>
> On 01/12/16 07:25, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>> OK then. Why was this change no merged then ?
>> Maybe it is a lot slower ?
>> Is this VM available somewhere ?
>
> It was reverted, as that vm had more stability problems.
That is very general ;-)
>From a distance (not knowing anything about it), it seems that HDi support was considered not important. Else more people would work on it to fix its teething problems, no ?
> Stephan
>
>
>