Guillermo Polito wrote
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:52 PM Alistair Grant <
> akgrant0710@
> >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Esteban, Guille and Everyone,
>>
>> I haven't looked at using FFI much, however it is easy to imagine that
>> different file encoding rules on different platforms will make writing
>> FFI calls more difficult,
>
>
> Well not really (from my point of view :))
> From the point of view of the FFI call an encoded string is just a bunch
> of
> bytes. FFI does not do any interpretation of them.
It *would* be pretty handy for adding some auto-conversion into the
marshaller based on parameter encoding options though... (other than
filename, could be done in smalltalk using exisiting encoders)
self
ffiCall: #(bool saveContentsToFile(String fileName, String contents))
options: #(+stringEncodings( fileName return , platformAPI contents)
Well, I like this idea.
(And yes, I've probably badly mangled the options syntax)
Is much less verbose than having to manually convert Strings to the proper
platform Unicode encodings before calling.
Depends a bit on whether the primitive argument is
Byte/Widestrings(latin1/utf32), or if it accepts only utf8 bytes and one has
to convert first anyways.
It's not like this isn't a pain point, there are plenty of currently used
API's that are broken if you try to use non-ascii.
Yes, but I think this may be because in general people tend to not know how encodings work... (even myself I don't feel I know enough :))
But this makes me think that we should make encoding explicit?