On 22 May 2013 10:38, St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
> I would use
>
> TextModelCore
> TextModelExtensions
>
> TextModelCore-Tests
>
> No extra dash in the middle.

nooooo :)

But for tests, i +1, the names are not very good.
For package:

Package-Name-Tick-Tack

tests should be in:

Package-Name-Tick-Tack-Tests

This convention used everywhere in pharo.

> Stef
>
> On May 21, 2013, at 10:24 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2013/5/21 stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@free.fr>
>>
>>
>> On May 21, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> 2013/5/20 stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@free.fr>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> New TxText version 0.8 is ready:
>>>
>>> - editor stuff extracted to separate packages TxText-Editor and
>>> TxTextTests-Editor
>>>
>>> may be you should call the second package TxTextEditor-Tests
>>
>>
>> I just follow convention of other TxText packages: TxText-Model ->
>> TxTextTests-Model, TxText-Layout -> TxTextTests-Layout and etc.
>> Some times ago I suggest such repackaging and nobody was against it
>>
>>
>> Still I think that the packages names are not good. I do not hitnk that
>> having tests mixed with the package name is a good approach
>> and we should clean all of them for 3.0
>
>
> So what the correct way (Pharo way) to name test packages?
> For example I have 'MyPackage-SubCat1-SubCat2'. What name for test package
> should be?
>
>>
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.