The mail was more that I would prefer to have less block inside block and cull:

On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:14 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

That is what I knew, too. I asked because the mail seemed to suggest that it would work :).

Doru

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:

no, it is not.��

that will keep the registry forever because it acts over a block (no ephemerons, remember)

Esteban

On Aug 28, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

Does this work?

Doru

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:54 AM, St��phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:

whenListChanged: aBlock
�� �� �� �� "Specify a block to value after the contents of the list has changed"

�� �� �� �� "Basically when you set a new list of items"

�� �� �� �� <api: #event>
�� �� �� �� | block |
�� �� �� �� block := [ :announcement :ann |
�� �� �� �� aBlock
�� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� cull: announcement newContents
�� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� cull: announcement oldContents
�� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� cull: announcement
�� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� cull: ann ].
�� �� �� �� listAnnouncer weak
�� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� when: ValueChanged
�� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� do: block

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"