2018-02-18 22:01 GMT+01:00 Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl>:
Nicolas Cellier
<nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
> But whatever the bug, why saving in the package-cache?
> The package-cache is just a cache as the name tells.
> It's less volatile than RAM, but can still be subject to aggressive cleanup.

Because it is much more reliable than network, and it depends on simpler
and working infrastructure. The package cache is deliberately not cleaned,
and not shared by default.

Stephan


If it would be me, I would then go for my own MCDirectoryRepository.
These are my files, I want to be in control and manage them by myself.
Eventually save them on another medium, and not mix them with thousands of other files that generally populate a package-cache.
Do you see what I mean?