I understand the problem and I did not explain well but the solution of the Graphics package seems great :
Graphics-Text
Graphics-Files
and
GraphicsTests-Text
GraphicsTests-Files
Other packages like Graphics : CollectionTests-*, KernelTests-*, ...
Packages with other naming conventions that do not seem great : File-Tests, Tests-*, Monticello-Tests
Sure, a system that does not rely on string maching would be better.
#Luc
2008/9/11 St�phane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>
On Sep 11, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Luc Fabresse wrote:
the convention <category>Tests[<-subcategory>] seems great IMO.
e.g. Graphics-Text -> GraphicsTests-Text
With this naming pattern it is possible to have 2 monticello packages : <category> and <category>Tests
And it is possible to not load Tests packages in a deployed image.
With this I cannot have
Collections-OrderedCollection
and
Collections-OrderedCollection-Tests
separated from
Collections-Set
and
Collections-Set-Tests
For me I want to have packages that I can load independently and the tests should be attached to the package (to be eventually not load with it).
I really hate the fact that we feel everywhere category and string matching.
Stef
Luc
2008/9/11 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre@bergel.eu>
Having a package name without any - will prevent Monticello from being confuse on some point.
Stef and I already experienced that...
I was never happy in inserting a - in a package name.
Alexandre
On 11 Sep 2008, at 07:23, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:32 PM, St�phane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi
I noticed that we have CollectionsTests-Ordered
kind of package name and I would prefer to get Collections-Ordered-Tests
What do you think. I bit of regularity would help.
Collections-Test-* categories belong to the Collections-Test package
on monticello. If you rename it to Collections-Ordered-Tests, you will
put everything in the Collections package (because there is no
Collections-Ordered monticello package).
--
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ah�: �I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck�. (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project