Am 28.01.2014 um 23:47 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:


On 28 Jan 2014, at 23:34, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:


Am 28.01.2014 um 22:50 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:

they do not appear because they shouldn�t :)

MCPackage = RPackage in 3.0

Ah, very good. I see this of course shortly after I applied ones again stupid package names to be able to separate tests.

that means that you need 3 mc packages� or 1 r packages + 2 tags

tags? What year is it? At the moment I�m feeling as I had been off the list for quite a while! Ok, I�ll try to find these myself. 

Btw. 30 minutes ago I found metacello stuff (create baseline, create development version) in the menu of the monticello packages. Great stuff! Are you sure there isn�t a lot of good stuff sneaking in without anyone noticing?

btw� there are still some glitches with that that need to be fixed. Please report if/when you find them :)

Oh my, I hate it because that is the one thing I�m good at�.finding bugs.

cool� we need more like you (and so far Stef has the podium) :)

Is there anything to take care in a mixed environment. I have 2.0/3.0 mixed setting here. From now on I like to develop in 3.0 even if the code is loaded into a 2.0 image. Can I expect trouble when loading the finer grained packages produced via 3.0 in a 2.0 image?

Norbert


Norbert

Esteban

On 28 Jan 2014, at 22:29, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:

I have a project that defines a package

Project-Core

then I added some more like

Project-Core-Exception
Project-Core-Command


but those do not appear in the monticello package. Is it supposed to be that way from 3.0 on or is this a bug?

Norbert