Thanks for the investigation Dale...now...suppose I want to fix it and I want to force to load gofer again. How can I do that ? because if I try to install it normally, it won't do it as it is already installed.
Thanks
Mariano
Mariano,
The Pharo-1.0.changes file looks to be corrupted. If you edit the the changes file and search for ConfigurationOfGofer here's what you see:
!ConfigurationOfGofer methodsFor: 'accessing' stamp: 'nk 3/5/2005 15:28'!
sNil! !
!ConfigurationOfGofer methodsFor: 'baselines'!
1 into: [:sum :each | sum * (self foo: each)]! !
!ConfigurationOfGofer methodsFor: 'versions'!
tring].
� � � �^string! !
!ConfigurationOfGofer methodsFor: 'versions'!
RefactoryTestDataApp methodsFor: 'inline'! !
!ConfigurationOfGofer methodsFor: 'versions'!
inlineComponent
� � � �| a |
� � � �a := 5.
� � � �^a class
� � � � � � � �superclass;
� � � � � � � �hasImmediateInstances;
� � � � � � � �yourself! !
!ConfigurationOfGofer class methodsFor: 'accessing'!
h |
� � � � � � � � � � � �each printString.
� � � � � � � � � � � �^anObject]! !
!ConfigurationOfGofer class methodsFor: 'loading'!
! !
!ConfigurationOfGofer class methodsFor: 'metacello tool support' stamp: 'md 3/14/2006 16:47'!
malltalk at: #MyTest
� � � � � � � �ifAbsent:
� � � � � � � � � � � �[| collection |
� � � � � � � � � � � �collection := #().
� � � � � � � � � � � �Smalltalk at: #MyTest put: collection]! !
!ConfigurationOfGofer class methodsFor: 'metacello tool support'!
ng new! !
!ConfigurationOfGofer class methodsFor: 'metacello tool support'!
or: 'inline'! !
!ConfigurationOfGofer class methodsFor: 'private' stamp: 'DaleHenrichs 1/25/2010 13:14'!
bootstrapPackage: aString from: aPath
� � � �| reposito
! !
!ConfigurationOfGofer class methodsFor: 'private'!
4:51'! !
So somehow the source was corrupted ... the compiled methods are correct since:
�ConfigurationOfGofer project versions
gives the correct answer. The source following ConfigurationOfGofer looks fine so I can't imagine how the source would have been corrupted especially since the methods were compiled correctly...
Dale
| --
----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
| wow...you are right....but I have NO idea how that could have been
| done.
|
| Adrian: look at the instance methods of the class ConfigurationOfGofer
| and
| you will notice what Erwann says.
|
| Dale, do you have an idea how this can be done ? �As I remember
| correctly, I
| just evaluated:
|
|
| Gofer new
| � � squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository';
| � � package: 'ConfigurationOfPharo';
| � � load.
|
| ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfPharo) project version: '1.0-10517')
| perform: #silently: with: true; perform: #load.
|
|
| to generate the Pharo1.0 dev image. This code will bootstrap Metacello
| and
| thus, install Gofer. Do you think there could be a problem there ?
|
| Thanks Erwann for reporting! �Open a bug ticket please.
|
| Cheers
|
| Mariano
|
| On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Adrian Lienhard
| <alienhard@netstyle.ch>wrote:
|
| > Hi Erwann
| >
| > What does scrambled mean?
| >
| > I cc-ed to Mariano, he may more quickly see whether there is
| something
| > wrong.
| >
| > Cheers,
| > Adrian
| >
| > ___________________
| > http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
| >
| > On Apr 20, 2010, at 16:34 , Erwann Wernli wrote:
| >
| > > "ConfigurationOfGofer class" seem scrambled in the download of
| Pharo 1.0
| > form the website -- don't know what happened or if it's only on my
| image.
| > >
| > > Erwann
| > >
| > >
| > >
| >
| >
|
|
| Subscription settings:
| http://groups.google.com/group/metacello/subscribe?hl=en