On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:


On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi guys

PackageInfo has a large APi that is often not used.
So I would suggest that we reduce the PackageInfo API first because it will lower the stress on RPackage to be offer a
compatible interface.
All the methods in the compatibility should somehow disappear or only serve as purpose to help temporary
backwards compat.


I agree. But if you want to remove in the future PackageInfo, then RPackage HAS to provide a way to get the classes/extension methods of a MCPackage. That's why I need #allDefinedClasses and #allDefinedExtensionMethods


Unless we attack MCPackage at the same time



What do you think?

Stef



--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com