(From my vacations)

Doesn't this solves the problem?

stream << $( << name << $)

It is already there :)

Now I comeback to watch the see...





On 25 Jul 2015, at 18:39, Hern��n Morales Durand <hernan.morales@gmail.com> wrote:

In BioSmalltalk I use this pattern a lot:

    aStream
        nextPutAll: self name
        between: $[ -> $].

so yes, that would be a nice inclusion for me :)

Cheers,

Hern��n




2015-07-24 17:48 GMT-03:00 stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:
HI

while working on a lecture I saw that we have about 75 cases like:

            aStream nextPut: $(.
                ....
            aStream nextPut: $).



    storeOn: aStream
    "Store a description of the elements of the complement rather than self."

        aStream nextPut: $(.
        absent storeOn: aStream.
        aStream nextPut: $); space; nextPutAll: #complement.


printElementsOn: aStream
    aStream nextPut: $(.
    self size > 100
        ifTrue: [aStream nextPutAll: 'size '.
            self size printOn: aStream]
        ifFalse: [self keysSortedSafely
                do: [:key | aStream print: key;
                         nextPutAll: '->';
                         print: (self at: key);
                         space]].
    aStream nextPut: $)

we have surroundedBy: aString

surroundedBy: aString
    ^ self class streamContents: [ :s|
        s nextPutAll: aString.
        s nextPutAll: self.
        s nextPutAll: aString ].

But only working on aString.
To me it looks like it ia class for having it on stream.

What do you think?