On 23 January 2013 15:24, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar@gmail.com> wrote:This is not sounds foolish..
> On 23 January 2013 14:05, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 23 January 2013 11:08, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> so yeah, looks like the linux VMs won't run anymore under ubuntu 10
>>>
>> The software upgrade hit us back.
>> Should we install ubuntu 10 slave to build VMs on it?
>
> At the risk of sounding foolish, is it possible to write the Makefile
> to use a particular (and configurable) glibc, rather than the glibc
> that just happens to be on a machine?
>
The last time i faced problem(s) with glibc i found it very
> That way one could use whatever machine, and say "use glibc 2.11".
>
non-trivial to have two
different versions of it on a system, and i remember i failed back
then, trying to convince
compiler to use proper version of it.. and then linker and etc..
and i ended up in having so much mess, that at the end i just decided
to reinstall a system. :)
But it was long ago.. don't know maybe i was doing something foolish
and solution is easy (at least today).
> frank
--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.