I disagree and I downvoted the question because its clear he did not even bother to google for documentation. Maybe he forgot or maybe he meants something else than it is already available.�� I am mostly against SO strict policy but in this case I will have to agree with it, the question is too vague for it anyway. ��

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess@web.de> wrote:

2014-10-17 23:43 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com>:
Nicolai Hess wrote
> It is a valid question

I agree. And at the same time, after reading their reasoning, while
seemingly overzealous, their decision seems logically sound based on SO
rules. I added this comment:

�� I think that the closest you have is
ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoProjectCatalog/��, which is an
attempt-in-progress in making a package catalog. Also, most better-known
Pharo projects seem to be hosted on SmalltalkHub which provides a Markdown
description for each project (provided of course that someone has filled it
out!)

thank you!

��

-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Question-on-Package-comments-SO-tp4785191p4785223.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.