Thanks again for tackling this! I'm definitely available to collaborate :)


Denis Kudriashov wrote
> Do you think that presenting any letter with real object (not just
> character) is sufficient for modern computers? I think not. Of course such
> model significantly simplified all logic around text layout stuff. But I
> think it is too expensive.

I don't know how efficient it would be, but how much text do we really
layout at once? If it makes the code simpler and more beautiful, then it
would be my starting point. Doing otherwise is premature optimization.


Denis Kudriashov wrote
> Another thing which I always not agree is introduction scripting languages
> inside smalltalk... [but] I like what they do inside rules. It is
> really simple and understandable code.

Yes, I think a special scripting language would be way outside the bounds of
Pharo, but the rules idea simplicity of that style could be great for us :)

Cheers,
Sean



--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/TxTextMorph-based-on-new-text-model-tp4663219p4669991.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.