On 02 Dec 2013, at 16:24, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:

> Uko2 wrote
>> Shouldn�t we develop our tools in a more friendly way?
>
> That would be fantastic. This thread is very interesting!
>
> And, I just want to remind everyone that Pharo 3.0 is unreleased... Do not
> expect it to be stable,

It�s not about stability of pharo 3, it about concurrency. And it�s the same problem in 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.0. I can write ruby code while running tests, but I cannot do that in Pharo.
This thread doesn�t seem to have any reason, so I should just apologise for creating it because of frustration and ask everyone to stop discussing this :)

> although it is remarkably so for the amount of deep
> changes that have been made. Maybe that has lulled us into a false sense of
> security/expectation. Remember, caveat emptor until it is released, when
> there obviously shouldn't be any changes which might introduce this kind of
> bug.
>
>
>
> -----
> Cheers,
> Sean
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Responsible-development-tp4726686p4726749.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>