On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Romain Robbes <romain.robbes@lu.unisi.ch> wrote:
yes, this test should either be deleted or rewritten. When I'm back
from holidays I'll look into it.
Ok. Don't worry. If your fix comes before I build next pharo dev, I integrate it, otherwise, I will remove it for a while and then if you do it we put it again. ok ?

cheers

mariano

� �Romain

On Monday, February 15, 2010, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is stupid to have tests that depend on what else is loaded in the image.
>
> OB and RB (for some parts) use a fake image with fake classes and
> methods in which they run their test.
>
> Lukas
>
> 2010/2/14 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com>:
>> Hi Lukas/Romain.� While building a PharoDev, I noticed that
>> ECUntypedModelTest >> testNarrowWith�� is failing.
>>
>> The problem is in:
>>
>> ��� self assert: count > 100.
>>
>> as "count", which is equal to "model entries size", is 98.
>>
>> Of course, if I change it to
>>
>> self assert: count > 90.
>>
>> for example, it works prefect.
>>
>> I have no idea about this. What do you think ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Mariano
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project