8. 2. 2015 v 8:26, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess@web.de>:

2015-02-07 13:17 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess@web.de>:

2015-02-06 22:02 GMT+01:00 Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka@gmail.com>:

I have changed two methods of the configuration:

-=-=-

stable: spec

<symbolicVersion: #stable>

spec for: #'pharo2.x' version: '2.1'.

"after some modification in NB made it incompatible with 3.0"

spec for: #'pharo3.x' version: '2.3'.

spec for: #'pharo4.x' version: '2.7�. ��<<== added, maybe instead of pharo4.x could be common"

-=-=-

development: spec

<symbolicVersion: #'development'>

spec for: #'common' version: '2.3-baseline�. �<<== it is likely not necessary"

-=-=-

I have changed it, because I think there should be two lines in Versioner: one with development label, second with stable label.�

Then everything works.

Let me know if it helps.

Juraj

Thank you Juraj,
that works .... better, but now, commiting the new configuration
shows a bunch of "Critical Issues"

Critical Warning missing recommend field...

Critcal Warning The name of package x does not match file name x.7

Critical Warning No Version specified.
....

Not that easy. Maybe, the ConfigurationOfAthens was only written and updated by hand, does not work with Versionner?

I think, for now I will try to change the Configuration by hand without versionner.

There three warnings revealed by: (MetacelloToolBox validateConfiguration: ConfigurationOfAthens).�

It is easy to fix, well I guess. The one is a misspelling, two are about missing #versionString: and I suppose there should be versionString: #�stable�.�

It is fixed in ConfigurationOfAthens-JurajKubelka.46.mcz.

Then I have created by hand version 2.8. The �strange� think is that development do not point to the latest version. Is the 2.8 supposed to be stable or development version? ConfigurationOfAthens-JurajKubelka.46.mcz contains the 2.8 version as development version.