On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:54 PM, St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:

Yes I will!

Stef

> We are reaching 2.2 MB with shrinking based on this classes structure.
> Stay tuned :-)

I like when I hear that. This will start to be really sexy.

And it would be incredible much more sexy if we can load the network package (and maybe monticello). Having a PharoKernel of 2.2 where I can then load network/monticello is a dream.
Then I can deploy a Pharo production seaside image of a couple of MB

Hilarie do you know how far we are from that dream?
�

> I will create the next patches for methods
> reorganization.
>
> Please don't forget the second part of this fix:
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2069
>
> Many thanks!
> -- Pavel
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:58 PM, St�phane Ducasse
> <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
>> 12024
>> -----
>>
>> - Issue 2105: � Packages remodularization
>>
>> and now without obsolete classes
>>
>> Stef (thanks Pavel)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project