On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
> it was a time, when were able to track all activities around squeak,
> pharo and vm..
>
> today the amount of updates, news and activities is just overwhelming..
>
> a rusty locomotive, which once staying in backyard, repaired by Stef
> and Marcus and now goes faster and faster :)
>

I think we have to improve the foreknowledge about what will happen,
why it will happen, what it will mean, what are the related issues
etc.
I in most cases I have no clue about changes in package structure of
the image that are being performed and that require changes in Pharo
Kernel processing, initialization etc. As an example I can mention
recent CodeImporter integration.

I like the improvements rate but as the side effect it makes Pharo
less attractive platform for serious development.

It depends. Pharo 2.0 is UNSTABLE. It says it everywhere. If you want to do seriuous development you won't beusing Pharo 2.0, will you? ;)

�

-- Pavel

> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
>