On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre@bergel.eu> wrote:

I used Visualworks and Squeak, and frankly, I prefer to have embedded
morphic windows in a unique native window, as it is now in Pharo.
Application switching is easier in my opinion and I do not feel a need
to have an email clients between two code browsers.
As the discussion on save and quit testified, people have radically
different habits when programming. Even for simple things.
Interesting.

Cheers,
Alexandre

On 11 Jun 2009, at 10:58, Steve Wirts wrote:

> If the primitives existed in pharo that would allow someone to
> create and control native windows, I would be more than happy to
> take the time to try and massage morphic into working cleanly/
> elegantly with multiple windows.
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Michael Rueger<m.rueger@acm.org>
> wrote:
> > Also the GTK bindings and Newspeak use native windows (I
> > think?).
>
> Newspeak uses either native or morphic windows, depending on the
> wishes of the user.
>
> --
> Damien Cassou
> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
>
> "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
> popular by not having them." James Iry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel �http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project