Hi

I���m fed up. Why?
Because I see lousy code in Pharo and that such lousy code in Pharo is slower, and sure that writing a type inferencer
for pharo will be more complex, and probably will make sista more complex too.

I asked the pharo consortium to take a clear position because I want a better Pharo not the inverse.
So what is it.

You can write in your code but not in Pharo.

�� �� �� �� aCol do: #store

in Pharo we should write

�� �� �� �� aCol do: [ :each | each store ]

Block argument should be blocks else any static analyser will have to check it is a block, it is a symbol, is
it a RANDOM object that answer value.

Seriously can be not make the life of people doing program analysis simpler?

So now if I���m wrong then I will shut up and I���m really pissed that we do that without paying attention
to the consequence.

I asked the consortium to take position and to take action.
We should have a better code review for REAL.

S.