On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre@bergel.eu> wrote:

However, I am okay to have them in a separate package.

Yes, I would really prefer this option is nobody discover that they are really needed in the core. I would like to hear other opinions, thus.

BTW, you usually build your Moose images based in PharoCore or PharoDev?

Cheers

Mariano
 

Alexandre


On 19 Jan 2010, at 07:20, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80-
> Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove  Arc, Circle and
> Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than
> their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc
> and Circule shows the same. Evaluate:
>
> Arc example
> Circle example
> Spline example
>
> So, what do you think?  We break everything if we do this? opinions?
>
> Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :)
>
> Cheers
>
> Mariano
>

> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.






_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

<ATT00001..txt>