2016-09-03 9:22 GMT+02:00 stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:

Denis

can we also have

assert: aNumber withPrecision: precision equals: otherNumber

	self 
	assert: (aNumber round: precision) 
	equals: otherNumber

assert: aNumber closeTo: otherNumber

	assert: aNumber withPrecision: self defaultPrecision equals: otherNumber

defaultPrecision
	^ 2

We could add it but as different issue.

Also I really want move away from assertions to should expressions. It is much nicer to write things like this (which available in StateSpecs):

10.1234 should equal: 10.12 within: 0.01 ��"success"

10.1234 should equal: 10.12 within: 0.001 "failure"

Also I has idea that float assertions should always use default precision (like 0.00000000001) without special message.

(80.85 * 100) should equal: 8085 �� �� ��

It will fail now but I want it always succeed in such cases. Because in most cases users don't care about this. And when it has real value users will specify concrete precision