publicly?Me too. I already gave a first set of feedback.
As a general matter, I would be interested in:- unifying with the ZnLogEvent- Split the Log class- Possibly support Fuel serialization for each log entry
DoruOn Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:01 AM, phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
SystemLogger interests me as well.PhilOn Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
Hi Stef,
I�m definitely in for the SystemLogger. But as I am involved in it anyway a fresh look from another person on that stuff could be benefitial.
Norbert
Am 19.05.2014 um 09:10 schrieb stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:
> Hi guys
>
> This is a call for some of you that committed code and would like to do it with me :).
> I have some projects that I would like to push further in 4.0 and I'm thinking that
> he could be much more fun to do it with other people.
>
> Here are some topics
> - integrating the systemLogger
> - integrating/improving the new method categorizer
> - cleaning fonts
> - ...
>
> How this could work?
> We could have
> - some discussions
> - make a little roadmap
> - then we could work on the same slice and do code review
>
> I think that it can be fun and motivating. So let me know because I would like to have more social
> coding.
>
> Stef
>
--"Every thing has its own flow"