On 22.07.2011, at 02:10, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Igor Stasenko <
siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 July 2011 02:34, Eliot Miranda <
eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > � � today I committed the threaded FFI plugin along with the threaded VM and
> > hope to be able to support people in doing threaded FFI work on the x86
> > platforms really soon now (Esteban, amongst others, this means you ;) ).
> > �But to put the image-level code that uses the new FFI plugin into
> > production the standard VM needs to be upgraded to not crash with the
> > ExternalFunction image changes the new threaded FFI plugin wants. �The main
> > change is that ExternalFunction changes size, gaining a stackSize inst var
> > which is used to tell the FFI plugin how much stack spacer to reserve for
> > marshalling (its computed on first use). �The best way for this to happen is
> > to start using the ThreadedFFIPlugin as the standard plugin in the
> > Interpreter VM. The ThreadedFFIPlugin overall is simpler than the old FFI
> > plugin (no assembler support code) and better (fully reentrant). �But for
> > this to happen we may need to implement the platform=specific parts of
> > the ThreadedFFIPlugin (still entirely Smalltalk code) for PowerPC and ARM
> > (and perhaps others, SPARC??). �I understand what has to be done and I can
> > explain it to anyone interested in working on the problem, but I don't have
> > any hardware with which I can test the results so its pretty pointless my
> > doing the work and producing something inevitably broken. �So are there
> > people out there who would be interested in doing the port to PPC and ARM?
> > �It means fleshing out the classes
> > � � ThreadedARMFFIPlugin ThreadedFFICalloutStateForARM
> > � � ThreadedPPCBEFFIPlugin ThreadedFFICalloutStateForPPC
> > and having a solid understanding of how alloca works to do stack allocation
> > and how the ABIs on ARM and PPC pass registers.
> > here's hoping there are a few good low-level people who would be interested.
> > Let me know.
>
> I wonder if you find anyone today using these archs, not saying using
> squeak/pharo on them + knowing low-level details + wanting to help :)
>
> Right, chances are thin. �But then if no one is interested then the work doesn't need to be done. �Bert, you mentioned the other day that PPC was still relevant for etoys. �But am I right in thinking etoys never uses the FFI?