Hi David,

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:52 AM David T. Lewis <lewis@mail.msen.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 09:32:17AM -0800, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>�� �� ��In VisualWorks Message implements #= & #hash naturally; two messages
> whose selectors and arguments are #= are also equal.�� But in Cuis, Squeak
> and Pharo Message inherits #= and #hash from Object, i.e. uses identity
> comparison.�� This is, to say the least, annoying.�� Any objections to
> implementing comparing in Message to match VisualWorks?
>

That sounds like an obviously good thing to do :-)

Is the lookupClass instance variable relevant for comparisons? I am
guessing not, since we already have #analogousCodeTo: for that type of
comparison.

For me it is relevant.�� Two messages with different lookupClasses, e.g. one with nil and one with a specific class, represent different messages, one a normal send one a super send.�� So my changes in waiting include��lookupClass in both hash and =.�� I don't think it makes much difference, but the incompatibility with VisualWorks, while regrettable, feels correct to me.

Dave

_,,,^..^,,,_
best,��Eliot