Am 20.02.2013 um 11:17 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:

there is a problem with the package definition, I think (PetitXPath != Petitxpath), and new RPackage cannot detect they are the same... in fact, IMO that exposes an old PackageInfo bug, not an RPackage problem, so I think the real solution is to commit a package with a good package name.

So, what are the rules. Does the case sensitivity also reflect in method extensions? Meaning do I need to call the extension *petitXPath or even *PetitXPath?

Also, it does not looks like you have the lastest image... you should be seeing something like this:

Yeah, I made the screenshot with an older image. I retried it then with updating the image first. But seeing that the result ist the same made me send the old screenshot.

<Screen Shot 2013-02-20 at 11.15.07 AM.png>

(notice the diff morph has a bar in the middle, also two text label on top).

On Feb 20, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:

I opened a fresh pharo 2 (#20559) and loaded PetitXPath. Modifying a method does not mark the package dirty in monticello browser. And If I press the "changes" button I can see

<Bildschirmfoto 2013-02-20 um 11.00.54.png>

That basically shows all the code that is in the package. But from my own change I cannot see anything in there.

Norbert