On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:

As Markus said it is good idea to add #argumentNames to block.�

What exactly you want to see at TxText?

I ask because Igor make big progress on his design implementation which I think will replace my work totally.

So if you want to join his development you don't need my code at all (remove it)

Not totally from what I saw and monday all the tests were green and we published the code because it was the end of

a large refactoring to get immutable objects into place and having tests were cool.

When we start a new behavior like copyText we started with tests.

Stef

But my version (which is at configuration) is usable and works nice for end user applications. I actually use it for my tasks.�

2013/10/11 Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com>

I recently checked the progress on TxText and I saw that half of the tests fail
under 3.0 due to an incompatibility in Mocketry on BlockClosure>>#argumentNames
trying to decompile the block contents. This feature is no longer available,
instead you have to access the AST directly:

BlockClosure >> #argumentNames
� � � � ^ self sourceNode arguments collect: [ :each | each name ]

Would it be possible to integrate that on a 3.0 branch? It's quite a pity to
waste so many tests :)