We do not need new tools to take several lines and lots of irrelevant/redundant sugar down to one line with two relevant items. Please consider adding something like the attached to *anything* that is in the image; then load scripts will be far simpler than we are encouraging at present.

From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Mariano Martinez Peck
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:15 AM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo1.0-10507-rc2dev10.01.2

2010/1/22 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com>

2010/1/22 Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab@anest.ufl.edu>

I'm very pressed for time right now, but I like the external projects workspace. I still think that there is way too much code, as all of the work can be done by one method that forms the name of the configuation class and takes (at most) a version string. The phrase "syntactic sugar" comes to mind - not quite the same thing, essentially so for our purposes.

Why we don't use Loader ? Still in alpha state ? I like it and it's simple to use.

Because we are not even stable with the current tools. We cannot do all toghether. Please guys, we need to go step by step. Loader is still in development.

Laurent

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project