Hi, 

No, what is wrong is considering monticello itself an object oriented control management system. Right now MC does not provides anything that can be thought as that... even more, MC does not provides anything better than current CMS around... 
So, what we have now is an old CMS, and a lot of tools trying to be compatible with that old system. Imagine if GIT would tried to be compatible with CVS... and to create an object control management is a considerable effort, no one want to do, and probably pointless... at least right now.

best,
Esteban 


On Jul 4, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Dennis Schetinin wrote:

Am I wrong considering migration to Git-or-AnythingElseTextOriented to be a give up on hopes for a real object-oriented source control/management as it could and should be in Smalltalk?

Best regards,
Dennis Schetinin
Sent with Sparrow

On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 ��. at 16:02, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:


On 04 Jul 2012, at 13:50, phil@highoctane.be wrote:

I am using Mercurial for all of the other projects and technologies.

With a full copy of everything locally, it helps indeed when we get crashes...

But GIT/Hg isn't giving you the change sorter.

I have used/tried FileTree/Git(hub) a bit and it is cool and it works.
But I do miss (tools) integration in the image.
The workflow also changes a bit, it is no longer all Smalltalk.

IMHO it is not yet quite ready.

Sven