On 13 May 2011 13:09, St�phane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
> Yes sync with igor
>
> Stef
>
> On May 13, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
>> Me too. I would rollback until we have a better solution and very well tested. I think right now the consequences and worst than the original problem.
>>
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Marcus Denker <
marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
>>
>> On May 13, 2011, at 12:24 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>> >
>> > 1) have a fast/normal recompileAll
>> > 2) not to loose source code
>> >
>> > If the only way right now is rollbacking #dropSourcePointer and rollbacking the implementation in objects as methods, please do it. Right now we are in the worst case. For example, today when I discover the bug of loosing sources...I commit my own package with a lots of methods with the decompiled source...it took time to fix it. �So I think it is important to fix this.
>> >
>> I think we should roll back the change for now...
>>
>> All this shows that the source handling is *far* too complex... How would we realize source handling *today* considering today's resources? (aka: compression is free and memory even
>> on last year's cell phone 20 times larger than our complete system...)
>>
>> � � � �Marcus
>>
>> --
>> Marcus Denker �--
http://www.marcusdenker.de
>> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mariano
>>
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>>
>
>
>