Not being Glorp&#39;s author, I can tell it has over 600 green tests on pharo.� Of course it can have it&#39;s problems, but you have some confidence it is ok, and some sources for examples :).<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com" target="_blank">estebanlm@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">while a lot of years of suffering are clamming that I need to say: &quot;don&#39;t use RDBMs if you can avoid it&quot;, I also should point you to�<a href="http://dbxtalk.smallworks.com.ar/" target="_blank">http://dbxtalk.smallworks.com.ar/</a>, and GlorpDbx which is around and is the newer port to Pharo you can find :)<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div>
<br></div></font></span><div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">Esteban</font></span><div><div class="h5"><br><div><br><div><div>On Jun 26, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite">
<div><br>On 25 Jun 2012, at 21:41, Torsten Bergmann wrote:<br><br><blockquote type="cite">I&#39;m interested in both, mainly with the focus on <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">options for RDBM systems. Whats is the state of Glorp?<br>
</blockquote><br>If have been using Glorp with Postgresql and it works surprisingly well.<br>It is &#39;good old technology&#39;, not as sexy as all this NoSQL stuff, but reliable, well-known.<br>I think that Glorp is one of the coolest OO-RDBMS mappers around, in any language.<br>
<br>Sven<br><br><br>--<br>Sven Van Caekenberghe<br><a href="http://stfx.eu" target="_blank">http://stfx.eu</a><br>Smalltalk is the Red Pill<br><br><br><br><br><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>